What Does Melatonin Do To Cat

Group



City Council Chamber of

F Aenz


Europe Prize 1968
PARENT Council Chamber


Gilberto Bucci Faenza, February 8, 2011


Press


HEALTH DEBATE '



After three abundant hours of intense debate on the issue of Health Services District Faenza some remarks are in order.

Carradori We asked the Director General, taking advantage of its availability, clarity on the issue of wide-area perspective to see if it is an organization of program- or just functional. The Director
Carradori in this case has responded by saying that it will make all the choices to save time trying not to close the services. It should be noted however that

in the same report provided by the Director are often referred to terms such as reorganization is particularly addressed to Pediatrics, this often means that in a nutshell will be limited or cut some services.

On this point the concern of the City Council and our focused very carefully, because in a city like ours that prides itself on growing, can not be limited to services for birth and must be present on-call Medical Pediatric permanently active.

Abbiamo sottolineato alcune criticità riguardo alla questione della sostituzione di primari in procinto di essere collocati a riposo, il Direttore ha detto che verranno sostituiti.

Mentre sottolineamo con favore la nomina del nuovo primario di Chirurgia rimane aperta la questione post acuti dopo la chiusura della convenzione con la Casa di Cura Stacchini, servizio che veniva adeguatamente svolto da quella struttura e che oggi non ha risposte sostitutive adeguate; non può essere messo nel conteggio sostitutivo l’allargamento del convenzionamento di ulteriori 5 posti-letto nell’hospice Villa Agnesina, struttura destinata ad altra funzione.







Sull’hospice Villa Agnesina focused discussions with the request for financial support to that initiative. We consider it important but not essential in the context of health planning in our city. We had facilities such as Villa Stacchini adequately prepared to function as all-inclusive, from rehabilitation to long-term care, there has been subtracted in my opinion unnecessarily.

We are more concerned to account for those who must be effectively treated for issues related to serious heart disease who can not find answers in the hospital Faenza and that have to be transported to Ravenna with clear risks to health, since in these cases the decisive time elapsed between the event and care.

We are concerned to maintain our city services that give decent answers tailored to the needs of the area.
We spoke a site, we ask ourselves how much distance there will be a hub site, where more advanced care can be provided also to the citizens of this district.
on these topics are still waiting for answers, we believe the savings are right and proper, but should be of interest but have not only the organization and the services to citizens, our territory has already given plenty.

be noted in closing the apparent dichotomy between the majority groups, divided between fierce criticism and praise a bit exaggerated.

The attempt of the parent PD to pick up the shards of a common line, the majority has gone bankrupt. On this issue the majority of health left to Faenza is clearly split, even under pressure of a press critic distributed in the hall by members of the Laboratory Faenza. "

We will continue, even in a state of political confusion as occurred last night, to strongly support the interests of the territory and to closely monitor the implementation of the promises of renewal and investment that have been made during the ' meeting.
We take this commitment to the citizens as we have always done, because it can not be an impromptu moment, but continuativo nell’attenzione e nel monitoraggio delle situazioni.



(Gilberto Bucci)
Capogruppo Consiliare “La tua Faenza-UDC”